Blogs > polosboy > A Breath Away > Graceland/Neverland

Graceland/Neverland  

polosboy

7/3/2009 9:36 am

Last Read:
7/5/2009 7:59 pm

On the news this morning, I caught the tail end of some guy being interviewed about Neverland becoming the equivalent of Graceland. The guy was talking about bringing the animals back and how eventually he and the family hoped that Jackson's remains could be buried there. His biggest selling point was that Neverland is much larger than Graceland as if that makes some difference.

I'm sure that a lot of kids had a lot of fun at Neverland and have great memories of that place. In a way, I can see it as being a great place for kids to have fun again. Of course, it will be costly now to see the place and have that fun.

The thing that I cannot get beyond is what supposedly happened in that mansion. To make a shrine of the mansion seems beyond unbelievable. "And to your right, ladies and gentlemen, is the bedroom where boys slept with Mr. Jackson." It sends chills up and down my back to think that that mansion could be considered a wonderful place to be. Maybe they should rename it "Neveragainland."

Do I believe that Elvis Presley lived some exemplary lifestyle? No. Do I have a problem with Graceland? No! I consider it a tribute to a man's music and impact on music.

Do I think Mr. Jackson's music merits a tribute? Yes. Do I believe that Neverland being restored to a "theme park" for kids is proper? No. Fill those rooms with tributes to his music and his videos, etc. but leave kids out of it! Get rid of all the rides, etc. and sell off that part of the property so that nothing remains of that aspect of what was.

As time passes and as people such as this British guy now saying that Jackson had a ten year relationship with some unknown woman ... lol ... it seems that the rewriting of history has begun.

Would you tour Neverland? Me ... not only no, but Hell no!

Whitney
polosboy
29758 posts 

7/5/2009 7:59 pm

    Quoting pooxtr:
    I hate to disagree with you Whitney, cuz we usually are so close in thinking about things. May I ask if you've ever been selected for a jury panel? Because it seems to me that you've tried and convicted Mr. Jackson of things that were never PROVEN beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law, or by Nancy Grace on her angry white woman TV show. Oh, they tried, but never quite succeeded. Now, with that said, I am a fan of Mr. Jackson's music, and that is all. I really never have understood his choices for his personal life, and I don't intend to. I personally, don't believe that he molested any boys in that mansion, or anywhere else for that matter. I don't believe anyone but the parties involved will EVER know, and now one of them is deceased. Now, if there are tell-all books that are written, I believe it will be for money only, not to actually tell the truth. How will anyone ever know? It'll all be a one-sided story from now on. When children are involved, everyone is always so quick to think the worst, and accuse an adult of something. That is not always the case, and I believe it's happened a number of times. I know they are only movies, but take a look at "The Children's Hour", and "The Bad Seed" again. Children are not always the most reliable witnesses, and can be master manipulators at the same time. Especially when they are motivated by something, or someone to do so.

    Poox

Hey there! I know that he was found not guilty which is not the same thing as proving innocence. The key in the wording is reasonable doubt. There is also the factor that it was Michael Jackson, a star. O.J. Simpson was found not guilty also. Being found not guilty does not automatically mean that the person is or was actually innocent. Whether those things happened or not, Mr. Jackson seems to have been a man worth studying in an abnormal psychology class. I also know that 20 million dollars bought some silence. Those movies you mentioned are sad, but as you noted ....they are fiction. I regret that we do not agree as we usually do ... and I know that there's nothing either of us is going to say to change the other's opinion. Sorry about that! Thanks once again for sharing your perspective ... take care ... have a great week!!! Hugs!

Whitney

palminster
937 posts

7/4/2009 1:55 am

Neverland Valley Ranch (formerly the Sycamore Valley Ranch) is a developed property in Santa Barbara County, CA, most famous for being Michael Jackson's former home during 1988-2005. It is named after Neverland, the fantasy island in the story of Peter Pan, who never grows up. The ranch is located about five miles north of unincorporated Los Olivos and about 8 miles north of the town of Santa Ynez. The property covers an area of over 2,800 acres. On November 10, 2008, Jackson transferred the title to Sycamore Valley Ranch Company, LLC. The area surrounding Neverland previously consisted of working ranches. Today, the area is made up of vineyards.

On the other hand, Graceland is a large white-columned mansion and 13.8-acre estate that was home to Elvis Presley. It is located at 3734 Elvis Presley Boulevard in Memphis, TN in South Memphis' vast Whitehaven community about 12 miles from Downtown and less than 4 miles north of the Mississippi border. It currently serves as a museum. It was opened to the public in 1982, was listed in the National Register of Historic Places on November 7, 1991 and was declared a National Historic Landmark on March 27, 2006.

Presley, who died at the estate on August 16, 1977; his parents, Gladys and Vernon Presley; and his grandmother are buried there in what is called the Meditation Gardens.

It appears that I agree with the respondents typing the responses to you that it's unnecessary to visit either of those two iconic "shrines" as I don't want to worship false idols as written in one of the 10 Commandments. Even when it comes to celebrate their deaths, I don't need to visit their graves as we must continue with our lives although we'll never forget them in our hearts.

By the way, the funeral service set up by AEG Live will be held at the Staples Center in downtown LA on 7/7/09 (Tues.), but I don't want to travel there as hundreds of fans from all walks of life will drop by to pay their respects.


polosboy replies on 7/4/2009 10:36 am:
Hey there and thanks for adding further information about the properties! I agree with you about visiting such sites! Take care!
polosboy
29758 posts 

7/3/2009 9:42 pm

    Quoting GWJRinDetroit:
    Hey Whitney no jokes from me this time. I agree with all that you said. But I would never go to Neverland or even Graceland.
    Glen
Hey there and thanks for sharing your thoughts! I've never had a desire to tour Graceland and would never tour Neverland. Take care!

Whitney

GWJRinDetroit
7901 posts

7/3/2009 9:35 pm

Hey Whitney no jokes from me this time. I agree with all that you said. But I would never go to Neverland or even Graceland.
Glen

polosboy
29758 posts 

7/3/2009 9:25 pm

Hey there and thanks for sharing your thoughts! I agree!! Take care!!

Whitney

newfinder
19090 posts

7/3/2009 7:33 pm

Hell No!

XOXO

Jack

Take the road less travelled.

polosboy
29758 posts 

7/3/2009 5:53 pm

    Quoting Presto3:
    Thanks Whitney!

    For explaining the laws of Calif. I don't live in that state either.
    I'm 3000 miles away in New York.

    Thanks!
    C.
Hey there! You are welcome. I was wondering about that myself since there'd been the word put out that he would be buried there and then it suddenly got dropped with no explanation that I heard. Take care!

Whitney

Presto3
3596 posts 

7/3/2009 5:46 pm

    Quoting polosboy:
    Hey there and thanks for sharing your perspective! I am sure that there are a lot of people who agree with you. I don't know what laws exist in California regarding burial on private property, but if it is legal, then there's no one to decide such other than his family since he left no statement regarding such in his will. A problem with burial on private property could have to do with continued ownership of the property and there being no guarantee that the property might not be sold at some time in the future ... not likely in this case .. but it could. I am a fan of his music, and I totally agree that he was brilliant and a genius as a performer who was very well paid and honored during his lifetime. I would far prefer that they build some building as a museum to him however. Thanks again for sharing your thoughts! Take care!
Thanks Whitney!

For explaining the laws of Calif. I don't live in that state either.
I'm 3000 miles away in New York.

Thanks!
C.

polosboy
29758 posts 

7/3/2009 4:52 pm

    Quoting denison:
    Whitney,

    Shrines are not necessary for the achievements of music artists to be remembered. For fans of these two men, their lifestyles should be a detraction.

    If one wants to relive what made them great, play their music.

    David

    PS. Jackson's music does little for me. He was a good dancer but it struck me as rather ridiculous seeing overtly sexual performances by man with a that face and legs like pipe cleaners.

    Elvis's voice was beautiful and, before obesity, so were his looks. ;P
Hey there and thanks for sharing your perspective! I'd far prefer to listen to music at my convenience and desire. I've never had any desire to see Graceland other than on tv, and I would not go see Neverland no matter how pretty the place is. I have been to Arlington National Cemetery and to the wall in honor of those who died in Vietnam. I have toured the homes of Thomas Jefferson and George Washington. Somehow I can't place touring the home of Michael Jackson on anything resembling an equivalent in value list. Thanks again for sharing and take care!

Whitney

polosboy
29758 posts 

7/3/2009 4:35 pm

    Quoting Presto3:
    You are going to have a variety of comments on here on this subject.

    I watched Larry King live last night broadcasting from Neverland Valley Ranch. It is a very beautiful ranch that they took the TV viewers through. I'm a Michael Jackson fan and I loved his music. Just because others ranchers live around and near by to the Neverland Valley Ranch it is not up to them to say that Michael Jackson can't be buried on his own property. Even though he was in a partnership with some other person. I'm not the only person on here that is a fan. There is others that I assume are fans too. Michael Jackson was brilliant,& genius being the King of Pop.
Hey there and thanks for sharing your perspective! I am sure that there are a lot of people who agree with you. I don't know what laws exist in California regarding burial on private property, but if it is legal, then there's no one to decide such other than his family since he left no statement regarding such in his will. A problem with burial on private property could have to do with continued ownership of the property and there being no guarantee that the property might not be sold at some time in the future ... not likely in this case .. but it could. I am a fan of his music, and I totally agree that he was brilliant and a genius as a performer who was very well paid and honored during his lifetime. I would far prefer that they build some building as a museum to him however. Thanks again for sharing your thoughts! Take care!

Whitney


polosboy replies on 7/3/2009 4:46 pm:
Just adding this after looking up the law there ... sounds ambiguous! In California, local municipalities are given jurisdiction over cemetary matters. Under California law, burials must be in an established cemetary (with an established cemetary meaning 6 or more bodies), but it is left up to local officials to okay any home burials in rural areas.

Some conditions, if they are amenable to the suggestion of a home burial, may be that the body is buried at least 150' from any water supply and at least 25' from any powerline or neighbor's boundary. Also, there would be restrictions placed on burial by the health department if the person to be buried suffered from any communicable disease.

You can be cremated in California and the ashes can be distributed, but there are limits as to where ashes can be scattered. Again, you would need to check with your local municipality to see if either the scattering of ashes or the burial of a body would be allowed on your property.
denison
2683 posts 

7/3/2009 4:14 pm

Whitney,

Shrines are not necessary for the achievements of music artists to be remembered. For fans of these two men, their lifestyles should be a detraction.

If one wants to relive what made them great, play their music.

David

PS. Jackson's music does little for me. He was a good dancer but it struck me as rather ridiculous seeing overtly sexual performances by man with a that face and legs like pipe cleaners.

Elvis's voice was beautiful and, before obesity, so were his looks. ;P

Presto3
3596 posts 

7/3/2009 4:00 pm

You are going to have a variety of comments on here on this subject.

I watched Larry King live last night broadcasting from Neverland Valley Ranch. It is a very beautiful ranch that they took the TV viewers through. I'm a Michael Jackson fan and I loved his music. Just because others ranchers live around and near by to the Neverland Valley Ranch it is not up to them to say that Michael Jackson can't be buried on his own property. Even though he was in a partnership with some other person. I'm not the only person on here that is a fan. There is others that I assume are fans too. Michael Jackson was brilliant,& genius being the King of Pop.

polosboy
29758 posts 

7/3/2009 3:41 pm

    Quoting Lovah:
    I think it would be a large disrespect to make NEVERLAND a shrine for M.J. !!! The main reason would be because Michael himself could not live there anymore, after what had happened to him, then why should he be buried somewhere where his spirits had been broken ! Second, while watching the different TV shows on this, the newscast always showed M.J. secret closet, and always needed to mention that was where he placed personal things, so that no one would know about him, and made it sound so filthy !!!

    I prefer to remember him for his talents, and his contributions to the music and dance !!! If anything, let them build a place where all of his memories will be remembered for the positives in life !!!

    Charlie
Hey there! Your point about his distaste for the place after all that happened there, but the guy was saying that it would probably make him happy to be buried there thinking of how it used to be and with kids playing there again. UGH! I think your idea about building some other place is a far better idea!!! Thanks and take care!

Whitney

Lovah
5929 posts 

7/3/2009 3:29 pm

I think it would be a large disrespect to make NEVERLAND a shrine for M.J. !!! The main reason would be because Michael himself could not live there anymore, after what had happened to him, then why should he be buried somewhere where his spirits had been broken ! Second, while watching the different TV shows on this, the newscast always showed M.J. secret closet, and always needed to mention that was where he placed personal things, so that no one would know about him, and made it sound so filthy !!!

I prefer to remember him for his talents, and his contributions to the music and dance !!! If anything, let them build a place where all of his memories will be remembered for the positives in life !!!

Charlie

polosboy
29758 posts 

7/3/2009 1:48 pm

    Quoting shangi:
    I have a big problem with shrines in general a waste of space.
Hey there and thanks for sharing that perspective! I can see the logic in it!!! Take care!

Whitney

polosboy
29758 posts 

7/3/2009 1:46 pm

    Quoting 7mark8DreamWever:
    Hmmm... Would I tour Neverland? As a father of 4 I want to say "no" but then again, how much worse could it be than subjecting them to a Catholic Church service over Easter? Catholic Priests also have a "reputation" for taking advantage of young boys. And in holding such a lofty position of "spiritual" authority I argue that the Catholic Church is far worse than making a "shrine" of Michael Jackson's Neverland.

    EXCELLENT POST DUDE! Boy you sure do make me think things...
Hey there! Although I can see taking kids there who have no comprehension of that aspect of the place, it just seems wrong to me to take kids to take kids somewhere noted for the accusations and inappropriate behavior, molestation or not, which took place there. Hey, lol, does it have to be a choice ... either Neverland or a church? Nope, not in my book! lol .... neither might be the best choice! lol Also, you taking your kids to church means you are there to ensure their safety. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and adding to the discussion!!! Take care!

Whitney

shangi
5236 posts 

7/3/2009 1:25 pm

I have a big problem with shrines in general a waste of space.

polosboy
29758 posts 

7/3/2009 1:17 pm

    Quoting in2it90:
    I have no problem with making a shrine out of Neverland. I never got into Jacksons music, but that doesn't mean he wasn't great at his craft. I agree with you that whatever is done it should not be aimed at children. Even if he really never touched a child sexually, which I doubt, his relationship with them was inapropriate. I know from experience what sexual abuse can do to a kid. Even when you love the abuser. I would feel better about making places shrines for people if I thought it was for any reason but money. I have sympathy for Michael Jacksons family, but I can't see making a god out of any man.
Hey there and thanks for sharing your thoughts! I don't know that his father views anything as something other than a way to make money. If Neverland were set up as nonprofit with the money from tourism to go to its maintenance only, I could be fine with that so that it would not be a burden on his kids to maintain the mammoth cost of running the thing ... as long as there are no kiddie rides. That he nominated Diana Ross to be the guardian of his children if his mother preceded him in death speaks to one more cloud as to how "normal" he was ... not. That his funeral is being turned into a circus of invited guests, lottery winners, and paying spectators ... speaks to the strangeness of the family as a whole. While it could be viewed as "generous" of them to open this event to a huge number of fans, at the same time .. it is not a concert. I hope that somehow in all of it, his children's well-being is considered. I wonder which networks have put out bids to televise it for ratings. And all the shows such as ET will have their news hawks present to prey on the stars attending. It will be a day that I will be inclined not to watch either the evening news or any of those shows. Thanks again for sharing your insight!!! Take care!!

Whitney

7mark8DreamWever
279 posts 

7/3/2009 12:30 pm

Hmmm... Would I tour Neverland? As a father of 4 I want to say "no" but then again, how much worse could it be than subjecting them to a Catholic Church service over Easter? Catholic Priests also have a "reputation" for taking advantage of young boys. And in holding such a lofty position of "spiritual" authority I argue that the Catholic Church is far worse than making a "shrine" of Michael Jackson's Neverland.

EXCELLENT POST DUDE! Boy you sure do make me think things...

"Make it so." - Capt. Jean-Luc Picard, USS Enterprise

polosboy
29758 posts 

7/3/2009 10:36 am

    Quoting callman:
    Given the location of Neverland Ranch in the Santa Ynez valley, I seriously doubt that the neighboring ranchers would put up with the tourism part, again...just as they hated all the traffic and hoopla they had to endure at Ronald Reagan's Rancho Cielo, during his administration. It's a beautiful valley and I've driven through it many times on my way up to Solvang and Paso Robles..an alternate route on a two-way highway that gets you off the freeway (101), for a while.
Hey there and thanks for sharing that information!! I hope that the ranchers live up to what you said!!! Take care!!

Whitney

callman
4116 posts

7/3/2009 10:18 am

Given the location of Neverland Ranch in the Santa Ynez valley, I seriously doubt that the neighboring ranchers would put up with the tourism part, again...just as they hated all the traffic and hoopla they had to endure at Ronald Reagan's Rancho Cielo, during his administration. It's a beautiful valley and I've driven through it many times on my way up to Solvang and Paso Robles..an alternate route on a two-way highway that gets you off the freeway (101), for a while.

Best regards, Callman

Become a member to comment on this blog